TimeOutNews Article Directory

Many countries across the globe are seriously exploring the concept of electronic voting. Rather than a paper ballot, or any sort of mechanically punched cards, using an electronic voting machine can reduce the risk of a voter accidentally voting for the wrong person, or having their vote go missing. In theory electronic voting machines are a great idea. Unfortunately, no one has found a way to create one that can’t be misused. One such exploitable e-voting machine was recently discovered in India by researcher Hari Prasad.

Hari Prasad recently revealed on national TV (in India, that is) that the electronic voting machines set to be used across the country have some pretty serious security flaws, and could easily be tampered with. In doing so, he got himself into some trouble with the law. Specifically, he is being charged with the theft of the voting machine he used to expose the security risks of the exploit.
India’s government is very strict about who has access to their voting machines, and as such, the fact that Prasad got a hold of one is a big deal. They very badly want to know where he got it, and who gave it to him.

Hari Prasad was arrested on August 21st when he refused to provide police with the source that provided him with the voting machines he’s been working with. He was then taken to Mumbai for questioning. The trip took over fourteen hours, and once there, Prasad was offered a break if he would just reveal his source. Prasad believes strongly in his work, and in the fact that these voting machines aren’t fit for use in a major election, and as such, he has not given up his source. He intends to keep fighting for the work he believes in.

Prasad may be facing legal troubles, but his work, and the work of those like him is extremely important. If electronic voting is going to have a part in deciding who governs each country, then the kinks need to be worked out. If an e-voting machine could be exploited to give inaccurate results, then the whole point behind switching to an electronic voting system is nullified. Hopefully, the companies that manufacture electronic voting machines, the governments commissioning them, and the researchers trying to determine their reliability can all learn to work together to make the best voting machine possible.